The course of the trial was as follows: during previous hearings, three family members testified against Petra Quick and confirmed the false claims she is accused of by James. MUDr. Alice Vrecionová was called as an additional witness, and she confirmed that she has known Petra Quick, James Quick, and the entire family for 13 years. Vrecionová explained that they met when the Quick family rented a property from her family, and over time, their relationship developed into a friendship.
MUDr. Alice Vrecionová was requested as a witness by James Quick in Sweden, where she was supposed to provide evidence that Petra Quick had lied about her entire life. In a trial in the Czech Republic, Vrecionová confirmed that she knows the Quick family very well and has a detailed insight into their lives. She also mentioned that Petra Quick helped them with accounting. It is interesting to note that Swedish police and courts previously blocked all testimony that could have proven Petra Quick’s false statements, raising questions about the motives behind the authorities’ actions and how they allowed Petra Quick’s lies to be legalized.
This situation raises questions about how the Swedish legal system operates, where critics claim that corrupt conditions are created in Sweden that allow women to legally lie to gain advantages, especially in cases involving children, money, property, or obtaining information for the secret police SAPO. Critics argue that this system violates men’s rights and creates an environment that encourages women’s lies and limits the possibility of proving the truth. In Petra Quick’s household, many family members, friends, and children lived who could testify to the real situation.
According to advocates for men’s rights, this situation would not be possible if the Swedish legal system fully respected the rights of all parties and prevented manipulation through false claims that could be politically and economically abused.
In the trial at the District Court in Prague 1, it is also noteworthy that Petra Quick refuses to present any Swedish documents and attempted to dismiss the trial on grounds of local incompetence. This was logically rejected, and the trial will therefore continue in the Czech Republic. If Petra Quick were to release any document, it could trigger one of the biggest scandals in Swedish legal history.
Currently, the Supreme Court in Stockholm is deciding whether it can overturn its previous decision and recognize Petra Quick as a liar or if it will open the door for all of Europe to the Swedish legal system, which could forever change the perception of Sweden. This case could have far-reaching consequences, not only for the Swedish legal system but also for the global perception of justice and law.
Within the framework of this legal dispute, it has also been revealed who is paying for Petra Quick’s lawyer. It is a person that Petra has previously described as having a questionable character. His father worked for the communist state security, and his son was, according to Petra, previously convicted of bodily harm. This person’s business connections often extend to state-owned companies in northern Bohemia.
Petra had almost no prior contact with this person, except when she needed help resolving her fraudulent activities, such as in school. This fact raises further questions about the background of Petra Quick’s legal support and possible hidden motives in her legal battle.
Leave a Reply