Oldřich Štoček

Dear readers,

I believe it is time to begin publishing email correspondence and information about her father, about whom Petra has, for 18 years, reported compromising information, including interesting emails and her father’s connections to the state-owned company DIAMO.

Since Petra, according to available information, cooperates with the Swedish Security Service (Säkerhetspolisen, Säpo), and her family has historically had connections to an employee of the communist state security police (StB) in connection with the uranium mines in Stráž pod Ralskem (today DIAMO), I consider Petra and her entire family to pose a risk to the security of the Czech Republic.

Unfortunately, her father, who earns tens of millions of crowns from contracts with state-owned companies and other individuals connected to politics and strategic enterprises, as well as significant sums from other businesses, has, in my opinion, not understood that instead of advising Petra not to lie and correcting her behavior, it is time for this relationship to end permanently so that Petra and her father do not harm the Czech Republic and its citizens.

Further information about this family will be available exclusively in Czech at:

www.oldrichstocek.cz

Note: Unfortunately, Petra received an offer from the intelligence services that one does not refuse – or perhaps could not refuse. However, every lie has its limit, and she has already crossed it. It also appears that her parents, who benefited from cooperation with the StB and from a life connected to state financial channels, are unable to understand that Petra’s behavior may have lasting intergenerational consequences for them in the future.

According to certain information, cooperation between Petra and foreign actors has allegedly resulted in significant financial losses for a number of individuals and companies, in some cases amounting to hundreds of millions or even billions. Many of those affected are said to be unaware of the reasons why their transactions were identified or scrutinized, and may not understand the broader circumstances behind their difficulties.

As has been observed, between 2021 and 2026, individuals who were associated with Petra appear in several cases to have deactivated their social media accounts and reduced their public presence, limiting the amount of information available about them. Prior to the summer of 2021, however, many of them, including Petra, were active and publicly visible both online and offline.

The post Petra presents the family’s activities on the OldrichStocek.cz website appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

This request does not constitute an accusation, nor does it presume guilt or legal responsibility. Its sole purpose is to enable independent fact-checking and objective assessment based on evidence that can withstand legal review.

Scope of the Review

Based on information received from third parties, allegations are being reviewed that Petra Quick may have:

• provided false or misleading statements to state authorities, including SÄPO (Säkerhetspolisen – the Swedish Security Service),
• provided false or misleading information to the Swedish Police and potentially to foreign intelligence or security services,
• been involved in situations requiring independent verification of statements or representations made to public authorities.

It is expressly emphasized that the above points are subjects of review only and do not represent established facts or conclusions.

Call for Public Cooperation

The anti-corruption platform requests cooperation from the public and invites the submission of any relevant and verifiable information by which the above-mentioned individual may be known, or that may help objectively confirm or refute the allegations under review.

We are seeking evidence-based materials only, including but not limited to:

• official records or decisions,
• written correspondence,
• contracts or agreements,
• financial, accounting, or technical documentation,
• other materials capable of legal assessment.

Rumors, speculation, or personal opinions are not requested.

Whistleblower Protection

Source confidentiality is respected. Anonymous submissions are permitted, provided the nature of the information allows it and the information was obtained lawfully.

Reward

A reward of up to 5,000,000 Swedish kronor (SEK) may be granted for verifiable and legally usable information that substantially contributes to clarifying the factual circumstances in the public interest.

The reward amount depends on:

• relevance and seriousness of the information,
• credibility and verifiability,
• legal usefulness of the submitted materials.

How to Submit Information

Secure reporting channel:
https://anticorruptionhotline.com/sv/report/?country=se

Legal Notice

This request for cooperation is issued with full respect for the presumption of innocence, data protection laws (GDPR), and applicable laws of Sweden and the European Union. Any further use or publication of information will occur only after legal review.

The post Request for Cooperation: Help Clarify Serious Allegations – Reward Up to 5,000,000 SEK appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

For decades, Sweden has been regarded as one of Europe’s most open and transparent democracies. According to critics, however, the year 2026 marks a turning point. Serious allegations and doubts are increasingly entering the public debate, raising questions about the functioning of state power, the role of intelligence services, and the handling of sensitive data belonging to citizens of other countries.

According to some claims and testimonies, Lars Furberg from Luleå, a person with a criminal background, was allegedly involved in cooperation with the Swedish security service Säpo (Säkerhetspolisen – the Swedish Security Service). Critics warn that reliance on such figures may lead to an erosion of the rule of law and the normalization of practices operating at the edge of legality and ethics.

Alleged Data Leaks and International Implications

A particularly sensitive issue concerns claims of large-scale transfers of data relating to Czech politicians, business figures, and private citizens, allegedly ending up within Swedish state institutions. If confirmed, such actions would constitute a serious breach of data-protection principles and a significant interference in international relations.

These cases reinforce concerns that Sweden may be drifting away from the standards it has long promoted at both European and international levels.

Media, Digitalization, and a New Form of Power

In 2026, one of Sweden’s largest digital newspapers is expected to be launched, technologically interconnected with state analytical and anti-corruption systems.

The Petra Case and Allegations of Abuse of Power

A central focus of criticism is the case of a person referred to as Petra, who, according to some activists and observers, was allegedly exploited by Swedish intelligence structures. Critics argue that she was a woman in a psychologically and socially vulnerable position, living outside a standard legal framework.

According to these claims, she was used as an instrument of state power, with consequences that allegedly permanently damaged Sweden’s reputation as a country committed to human rights. At a later stage, what critics describe as the most desperate step allegedly followed — the removal or erasure of records related to her statements — interpreted as an attempt to conceal problematic procedures.

It must be emphasized that these assertions represent critical interpretations by parts of the public, not officially established facts.

Transparency Versus Secrecy

These controversies raise a fundamental question:

Is Sweden still a transparent state, or is it evolving into a system characterized by secrecy, selective justice, and abuse of state power?

Critics point to elements Europe recognizes from its own history — covert procedures, reliance on informants, false accusations, and a strong state narrative that marginalizes inconvenient voices.

Crisis as an Opportunity for Change

Whether these allegations are ultimately confirmed or disproven, one conclusion is difficult to ignore:
public trust has been damaged. Yet this crisis may also serve as an opportunity — for open debate, rigorous oversight of power, and a return to the values on which modern democratic states are built.

Because genuine transparency is not measured by declarations, but by how a state responds to criticism.

Petra as a Symbol of Systemic Failure

In the eyes of some members of the public, Petra has become a symbol of everything that can go wrong at both the individual and systemic level. Critics argue that her case illustrates how far a combination of power abuse, lack of oversight, and reliance on unverified or manipulated claims can lead.

According to these views, Petra was repeatedly associated with false accusations and behavior perceived as extremist, morally compromised, and in conflict with fundamental social norms. There are also claims of links to criminal environments, drugs, and manipulative conduct — issues that critics say were never independently and transparently investigated.

Another serious point of criticism concerns Petra’s long-term financial involvement in companies in which she held no ownership stake, reportedly lasting more than 15 years. According to available testimonies, these activities were never adequately clarified or supervised, further deepening doubts about the role of the state and its institutions.

Erased Records and a Deepening Crisis of Trust

The most troubling step, according to critics, was the removal or restriction of access to documentation related to Petra’s statements made in Sweden. This move is seen as a desperate attempt to obscure institutional failures and prevent public scrutiny.

Through this, critics argue, Sweden itself demonstrated that it no longer functions as a fully transparent state, but rather as a system marked by hidden processes, selective justice, and a dominant state narrative that suppresses uncomfortable truths.

Rewriting History and the Loss of Values

Criticism also includes claims that Sweden may have strategically worked with information and historical interpretations in order to obtain sensitive data on foreign politicians, including public figures from the Czech Republic.

Such actions are viewed as a serious violation of European values underpinning cooperation among democratic states.

The result, according to critics, is a loss of international respect that cannot be concealed by technological innovation or media projects. A state that sacrifices transparency for power, they argue, reveals its true face.

Final Assessment

An increasing number of voices now conclude that Sweden has betrayed the values on which its reputation as a modern democracy was built.

Respect cannot be enforced —
it arises only where truth, accountability, and openness exist.

And you ask, who is Petra Quick (Petra Štočková)?
Petra is the granddaughter of a communist informant. Her father built a construction company using resources obtained through informing, and the company prospered thanks to benefits arising from connections to the son of a director of a state-owned enterprise. Petra failed to pay taxes and did not keep accounting records in her companies, in which she was actively involved in the field of personal bankruptcies.

She falsely accused a cameraman of sexual harassment. Likewise, she accused the school’s management as an act of revenge for failing her final examinations. She deceived another school which, based on her story, violated the law and allowed her to complete her studies in breach of legal regulations.

She later accused her sister’s husband of pedophilia. She encouraged her mother to rape her partner by administering chemical substances into his drink without his knowledge. She accused a Luleå Hockey coach of drug use. She referred to immigrants in Sweden in a racist manner as “welfare apes” and took part in fraud related to her son’s education.

In Sweden, she lied in connection with an offer of cooperation with the secret police so that Swedish authorities could obtain compromising information about friends who had helped Petra in the Czech Republic. These are the values that, according to this view, Sweden now represents because of Petra.

The post Intelligence Cooperation, Data Leaks and a Crisis of Trust: Why Sweden Faces Growing Criticism in 2026 appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

The purpose of the published information is to prevent manipulation of history, distortion of events, and the misuse of narratives that have been associated with Petra in the past. It also serves as a warning to anyone who may attempt to exploit behavioral patterns or actions attributed to Petra — because by doing so, they also assume responsibility for the consequences that such behavior has had and may continue to have.

For many years, there have been claims, testimonies, and available materials suggesting that Petra repeatedly took advantage of the trust of individuals who tried to help her, while creating her own versions of events related to her family and the environment in which she was raised. According to these accounts, such narratives were used to gain advantages in social and professional situations.

At present, it appears that the only things Petra still retains are materials and information related to conduct long attributed to her — including claims of fraudulent or dishonest behavior, manipulation, theft, discriminatory actions, handling or using psychotropic substances without medical supervision, as well as allegations of contacts with foreign security structures, including the Swedish security service Säkerhetspolisen (SÄPO).

These materials also include a long-standing pattern of making accusations of sexual harassment, from adolescence into adulthood, where such accusations were reportedly used to obtain personal or situational benefits.

Expansion on the Family Context

In relation to Petra, there have also been references to claims involving problematic behavioral patterns or historical circumstances connected to her family. In the available materials, references appear to:

• alleged contacts between certain family members and former structures of the Czechoslovak State Security (StB), including individuals identified under the cover name “Chalupář”,
• individuals connected to the leadership of the state-owned enterprise DIAMO in earlier periods,
• testimonies concerning persons who were reportedly subject to legal proceedings for physical incidents or assaults,
• mentions of alleged ties to high-risk or criminally exposed environments during Petra’s youth,
• and claims regarding the misuse of social welfare systems by certain members of the extended family.

Some historical testimonies also contain very serious allegations regarding inappropriate or risky behavior toward minors. These claims cannot be considered verified and are included solely as part of the materials that have circulated in connection with the family over an extended period of time.

Conclusion

This information has been made public so that its existence can no longer be concealed, distorted, or used for manipulation.

Anyone who chooses to use Petra as a tool for personal attacks, conflict, or pressure must understand that by doing so, they also assume responsibility for the broader context and values that have long been associated with her and her surroundings.

All necessary measures have been taken to ensure that foreign security services, including the Swedish Säkerhetspolisen (SÄPO), can no longer be misused or exert any potential influence over major or strategic contracts in the Czech Republic. Measures have also been implemented to prevent any further misuse of information that Petra previously had access to through her close proximity to individuals in politics, the judiciary, law enforcement, or families connected to public influence. Under the current circumstances, Petra and those closely associated with her can no longer be regarded as individuals for whom the Czech Republic represents a clear or primary priority.

Note: According to certain available claims and interpretations, Petra is said to have provided information to the Swedish security service Säkerhetspolisen (SÄPO), and it has been suggested that such information may have influenced the outcomes of several international contracts. If these claims were proven true, such conduct would be considered contrary to good ethical standards and could be viewed as harmful not only to Czech interests but also to American interests — particularly in cases where American companies competed for high-value government contracts worth billions and subsequently failed to succeed.

The post Risks associated with Petra appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

Many people today are asking the same question: Where did Petra actually disappear to?
Government officials are puzzled by the fact that her identity appears to have been erased from the Schengen system. How is it possible that, for roughly fifteen years in the Czech Republic, she paid no taxes, kept no accounting records, and avoided all financial inspections? How could she live in a country with strict population oversight while remaining invisible to every database?

Even more questions arise from evidence suggesting that Petra received protection from Swedish intelligence services. At the same time, documentation connected to her began to vanish or become inaccessible—not only in Sweden, but reportedly in several other European countries.

In 2021, her mother abruptly deleted all of her social media accounts, despite previously being highly active online. Paradoxically, she continued traveling and appearing in public while receiving disability benefits as someone supposedly in need of constant personal care.

Russian Mafia, Spies, and Covert Operations

According to available findings, a special operations team had been working around Petra, attempting to locate missing persons and identify members of the Russian mafia. Sweden, meanwhile, was trying to track spies operating within its borders. Both sides allegedly used the same cover—Petra’s fabricated identity, which became an ideal tool for concealing complex intelligence activities.

The so-called “Sugar Daddy,” a man with a significant history of cooperation with Säpo, local police, courts, and prosecutors, also vanished. After his conviction, he suddenly shut down all of his online accounts and withdrew into isolation. His quiet disappearance raises more questions than answers.

A Family in the Shadow of the StB and the State Enterprise DIAMO

Petra is not an ordinary woman without a past. She is the granddaughter of a prominent collaborator of the former Czechoslovak secret police, the StB, known by the codename Chapular. Her family also benefited financially for years from the state enterprise DIAMO. Strange events occurred there as well, including the removal of DIAMO’s director, Rychtařík, who had close ties to the family.

These connections point to an environment where power, information, and financial advantages are exchanged quietly, away from public scrutiny.

Classified Information for Säpo and Billion-Dollar Deals

The turning point came when it surfaced that Petra had been providing highly classified information to the Swedish security service, Säpo.

With this intelligence, Sweden was reportedly able to influence billion-dollar contracts between Sweden and the Czech Republic—to the Czech Republic’s disadvantage.

National interests were lost in the shadows of covert operations.

Thousands of Records That Should Have Been Erased From History

Despite Säpo’s efforts to eliminate the evidence, thousands of records linked to Petra still exist.
Internal emails, data transfers, and documents that terrify Swedish intelligence, as they reveal the true scope of operations that were never meant to see the light of day.

In the Czech Republic, this material raises concerns of a potential international scandal capable of destabilizing political and security structures in both countries.

Petra as a Ticking Time Bomb

Petra believed that her covert collaboration would make her wealthy. Instead, she became a ticking time bomb.
Documents outside the control of any government placed her under permanent surveillance by foreign intelligence services.

Her psychological instability and the risk that she might speak out—or be exploited by another power—leave only one possible outcome:

Petra will never again be allowed to live a public life.

She is condemned to a life of silence, monitored and controlled from the shadows.

The Woman Who Vanished—Because She Knows Too Much

Petra became a figure who can no longer be allowed into the public sphere; she became entangled too deeply in intelligence games built on deception, manipulation, and conspiracy.

Her very existence poses a threat to governments, intelligence agencies, billion-dollar contracts, and international relations.
The information she provided is a direct danger to several influential figures in the Czech Republic.

Warning

Everything that has ever been said or released about Petra is carefully controlled by intelligence services. Anyone who attempts to obtain official documents bearing her signature or any verifiable evidence always encounters the same response:
“Deleted. No record exists. No transcript exists. We cannot provide anything.”

This pattern is no coincidence — it is part of the largest failure of Swedish intelligence operations, which were willing to sacrifice anyone necessary to cover up their own mistakes. At the same time, it exposes how non-transparent Sweden truly is, and how deeply this operation affected the Czech environment, which chose to remove Petra entirely from oversight systems rather than admit the scale of the scandal.

For the First Time, the True Origin of This Website Is Revealed

This is a story of betrayal by family, betrayal by friends, and betrayal of the Czech Republic itself.
Petra has become living proof that Sweden is capable of conducting covert, dirty intelligence operations that violate human rights—rights it publicly vowed to uphold.
Her case also exposes just how non-transparent the Swedish state truly is, and how far it is willing to go to hide its own failures and corrupt practices.

But this time, the system collapsed.
When the operation began to fall apart, Swedish intelligence took an extreme step:
they completely erased all documentation connected to Petra.
Records disappeared, transcripts vanished, databases were wiped — as if Petra had never existed.

The StB Legacy: Chalupář and the Family Fortune

By a twist of fate, Petra now follows in the footsteps of her grandfather, a former StB agent operating under the codename Chalupář.
Through informing on others during the communist regime, he accumulated a multimillion-crown fortune. On this foundation, Petra’s father later built a construction company that cooperated with a state enterprise — using the contacts his own father had “passed down” to him.

A family that once benefited from the shadows of the past has, unknowingly, laid the groundwork for a story that has now turned against their own granddaughter.

The post Under the pretense of an attack by the Russian mafia and foreign spies, Petra is living under the protection of Sweden. appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

This address is associated with the most influential political family, whose influence extends from the judiciary to organized crime. Petra had access to confidential information, including fragments of this family’s accounting records, which holds significant power over the functioning of the state, including billion-dollar arms contracts. Petra disclosed this sensitive information to the Kingdom of Sweden (SÄPO). For this reason, in recent years, the Czech Republic has tended to favor everything connected with Sweden to the detriment of the Czech Republic and its citizens.

Petra is the granddaughter of Oldřich Štoček, a communist collaborator who, under the code name Chalupář, provided services to the Communist State Security (StB) in exchange for material gain. Her father later used the wealth obtained from this collaboration to establish a construction company in Stráž pod Ralskem.

Petra’s father is also connected to contracts with the state enterprise DIAMO, maintaining close personal relations with the company’s director, Tomáš Rychtařík. To secure better access to contracts, he took Rychtařík’s son on various holidays.

However, Petra’s family hides even darker secrets — connections to organized crime, scandals related to the use of steroids, pedophilia, and alleged experiments involving the administration of chemical substances in men’s food without their knowledge, aimed at enhancing sexual performance. There have also been reports of bodily harm cases that were allegedly covered up thanks to the family’s financial influence.

Petra has been publicly exposed for racism, insulting her own son, and possessing steroids and other substances intended to improve physical and mental performance. She has also been repeatedly caught engaging in racist behavior and systematic lying for personal gain.

Examine this photograph carefully, as Petra is a person who is currently hiding in Sweden due to having provided information to the Swedish Security Police. The matter is so serious that both the Czech and Swedish intelligence services have agreed it would be better not to speak publicly about the case.

However, this silence has cost Czech citizens billions of crowns as a result of disadvantageous contracts concluded between Sweden and the Czech Republic.

Petra is also causing harm to neighboring countries, as by providing information to the Swedish Security Service SÄPO, and thereby to the Swedish state, she has contributed to the conclusion of disadvantageous multi-billion-crown contracts for the Czech Republic. Financial losses have also been suffered by other countries, such as Germany, Austria, and the United States of America.

Sweden possesses highly compromising information about the most influential Czech family, as well as evidence of connections between the country’s most powerful political party and the criminal underworld. These links extend to the abuse of hundreds of Czech women and to secret gatherings filled with sexual services attended by influential politicians.

And here is where you can find her family: Jana Štočková — Žitavská 2532, 470 06 Česká Lípa (her mother organized, together with Petra, the administration of chemicals into drinks without her partner’s knowledge; for more than 20 years, she has concealed information about the pedophilia of her daughter’s husband, Štefan Čapucha) and Oldřich Štoček — Liberecká 25, 471 28 Hamr na Jezeře (her father financed Petra; allegedly to an extent that could hardly be considered moral. He is the son of a former StB informant, and his daughter provides sensitive information to Sweden for economic and personal gain). In Slovakia, her sister Jana Čapuchová — Budovateľská 1272/26, 941 11 Palárikovo (according to Petra, her husband’s sister is a dangerous pedophile, and she claimed to fear for her daughter Jessica; Petra called her own sister “an immoral pig”).

These are the first reasons why, since 2021, Petra has disappeared and her entire corrupt family

The post Závist 1344, Praha Zbraslav appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

• all e-mail correspondence and WhatsApp communications,
• testimonies of all persons who personally knew her,
• reports and statements from tax authorities relating to her person as well as all companies she represented,
• documentation and correspondence concerning the companies she managed.

Warning

Only a liar, fraudster, thief, and manipulator has no interest in declassifying all evidence that could help uncover the truth. Such a person benefits from a system where, in Sweden, lying can be legalized without any verification, in exchange for betraying targeted individuals and gaining financial advantage. Therefore, it is necessary to insist on full transparency and the disclosure of all relevant evidence.

This call is made in light of the fact that Petra Quick has repeatedly provided false information while at the same time attempting to obstruct access to evidence essential for the fair assessment of the case.

The purpose of this notice is to ensure transparency and enable a full clarification of all relevant circumstances.

The post Public Notice to Petra Quick (formerly Jehličková, née Štočková) appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

Under case number 31 C 121 / 2023, civil proceedings are underway in the Czech Republic against Petra Quick, who faces serious allegations — including obstruction of justice, concealment of assets, and manipulation within her own family.

The lawsuit presents compelling evidence of her effort to avoid legal liability by using international influence, suppressing the truth, and ultimately shifting the blame onto her son Adam.

Indications of Cooperation with Swedish Intelligence (SAPO) and an Attempt to Shift Jurisdiction

One of Petra Quick’s first moves in the legal proceedings was to attempt to transfer the case to Sweden, where she has longstanding personal ties. According to available indications, there is reasonable suspicion that Petra Quick has cooperated with the Swedish Security Service (SAPO), allegedly providing sensitive information about relatives of a high-ranking Czech politician.

According to witness statements, these connections allowed her to avoid prosecution, suppress the admission of evidence, and transfer substantial assets beyond the reach of Czech courts — including from a partner with whom she lived for 18 years.

Judgment Without Evidence: Legally Inadmissible Under Czech and EU Law

As part of her defense, Petra Quick submitted a ruling from a Swedish court that allegedly supported her position. The Czech judge, through official legal cooperation, requested the underlying evidence that supported this ruling.

The response from Swedish authorities was unequivocal: no archived evidence exists in support of the ruling.

Any judgment that lacks archived evidentiary material is legally inadmissible under both Czech and EU law. While no formal decision has yet been issued by the Czech court, it is expected that a motion will be submitted to reject the Swedish ruling due to its incompatibility with the Czech constitutional order.

Legal Analysis: Judgments Without Evidence Are Inadmissible Across the EU

According to Section 15(1) of Czech Act No. 91/2012 Coll., on International Private Law, Czech courts must not recognize a foreign judgment if doing so would be contrary to the public order of the Czech Republic — especially in cases where no evidentiary basis exists.

At the European level, the same protection is provided by EU Regulation No. 1215/2012 (“Brussels I bis”), Article 45(1)(a), which states that a foreign judgment shall not be recognized if it is manifestly contrary to the public policy of the member state in which recognition is sought.

This means that any judgment unsupported by documented evidence is legally unenforceable, and courts across the EU are obliged to reject such rulings. This has already occurred in practice in countries such as France, Germany, and Austria.

Digital Evidence: Emails, Messages, and Attempted Purchase of Steroids

A major portion of the evidence comes from Petra Quick’s digital communications on company devices, including:

• Email correspondence spanning over 15 years,
• Messages and internal records from her business phone,
• Messages documenting her efforts to procure anabolic steroids for her son Adam, with the intent to improve his performance and accelerate his biological development.

The content of these communications clearly demonstrates that Petra Quick was the primary decision-maker and directly oversaw key financial and personal actions at the heart of the dispute.

A Drastic Shift in Defense: She Blames Her Own Son

Faced with mounting evidence, Petra Quick changed her defense strategy entirely — she blamed everything on her son Adam, claiming he acted alone and without her knowledge.

This narrative is, however, flatly contradicted by witness testimony and the documented communications, which consistently show Petra herself issuing instructions, approving actions, and orchestrating the disputed conduct.

Privacy Objection: Unfounded and Self-Defeating

Petra Quick also raised an objection that the use of her emails and text messages constitutes a violation of her privacy.

The court has not yet ruled on this objection. However, the plaintiff noted that all of the data originated from company-owned devices, which are, by their nature, subject to legal audit and admissible in judicial proceedings.

Moreover, this objection only reinforces concerns that Petra Quick had previously lied in Sweden and that her real goal is to prevent the full truth from emerging.

If Petra Quick genuinely sought to prove her innocence, she would have no reason to oppose the disclosure of her full email and SMS history. Her refusal to allow this only deepens the suspicion that she is hiding incriminating evidence.

Conclusion: Legal Rejection of the Swedish Ruling Is Likely — And May Set an EU Precedent

Petra Quick’s case exemplifies how international connections can be misused to circumvent national and EU law. The Swedish ruling — issued without any evidentiary documentation — has no legal force.

It is expected that the Czech court will formally reject the Swedish judgment on the grounds of legal and constitutional inadmissibility. This case could serve as a precedent within the European Union for rejecting similar foreign rulings that fail to meet basic standards of due process.

The post 📰 Petra Quick in Court: Shifting Blame to Her Son, but Evidence Uncovers Manipulations, Asset Transfers, and Attempts to Evade EU Law appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

I. Legal Challenge of Swedish Court Rulings

The Swedish court decisions in cases B 2005-21 and B 961-21 have been legally challenged—most notably through an appeal submitted to the Swedish Supreme Court under case number Ö 5168-25. These rulings lack all fundamental evidence—there are no audio or video recordings of testimonies, no transcripts, and no preserved evidence.

This represents a direct and serious violation of the right to a fair trial and the right to review, as guaranteed under Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

There is credible evidence indicating that these judgments were based on knowingly false testimonies given by Petra Quick, intended to cover up the disappearance of property worth tens of millions of dollars, the theft of highly sensitive data, and an unlawful attempt to seize custody of her daughter Jessica Quick.

II. Concrete Evidence and Witnesses

As of today, over 100 witnesses are prepared to testify against Petra Quick. The case is further supported by:

• Documentary evidence from her business dealings.
• More than 15 years of archived SMS and email communications, proving that:
  • Petra Quick systematically and deliberately lied,
  • The Swedish court processes were knowingly manipulated to legitimize those lies.

III. Character Profile and Risks

Petra Quick has, for over two years, been publicly identified—including on the internet—as a:

• Chronic liar, fraudster, and manipulator, who has repeatedly harmed people close to her,
• Individual currently facing multiple civil actions for false claims and financial damages,
• Severe threat to any environment, as she:
  • Lies effortlessly and consistently for personal gain,
  • Accuses others of false crimes without presenting evidence,
  • Uses slander as a tool to eliminate family members who oppose her,
  • Has shown a lifelong pattern of destroying others to gain academic, financial, or legal advantages,
  • Is willing to provide information to intelligence services in exchange for immunity or protection of her false narratives.

IV. Serious Warning

We strongly urge government officials, legal institutions, employers, and private individuals to exercise extreme caution when dealing with Petra Quick. In jurisdictions where evidence can be concealed or destroyed to validate fabricated stories, her presence poses a serious legal and ethical liability.

Anyone attempting to support or legitimize Petra Quick’s lies must be aware that she has consistently lied about her entire life and background. Supporting her falsehoods may result in lawsuits, reputational damage, and the public release of hard evidence that proves the situation was entirely different than she claimed.

I. Absolute Duty to Archive Evidence under Swedish Law

A. Code of Judicial Procedure (Rättegångsbalken, “RB”)

• Chapter 36 § 6 RB imposes an unwavering obligation on courts to record or transcribe every witness statement and safely archive those records for any later appellate review.
• The deliberate erasure of all audio and video recordings and obliteration of transcripts is thus a direct breach of this statutory duty.

B. Archives Act (Arkivlagen)

• Arkivlagen (1990:782) mandates that “important publicly filed documents” may not be destroyed except through a formal archival evaluation process.
• Destroying records outside that strict framework constitutes obstruction of justice (Obstruktion av rättvisa).

By carrying out this mass destruction, Swedish authorities have rendered any factual reconstruction of these cases impossible, revealing a calculated effort to hide the truth.

II. Breaches of Fair‑Trial Guarantees under the ECHR

A. Article 6(1) – Right to a Fair Hearing

• Without recordings or transcripts, there is no way to meaningfully review or challenge the factual basis of the B 2005‑21 and B 961‑21 judgments.
• The European Court of Human Rights has ruled (e.g. Edwards v. UK, 46477/99) that withholding core evidence is a violation of Article 6(1).

B. Article 6(3)(d) – Right to Confront Witnesses

• Intentionally destroying witness records strips defendants of the fundamental right to examine witnesses against them.

C. Article 13 – Right to an Effective Remedy

• By preventing any genuine appeal—since there is no evidence left—Sweden has denied all effective remedies, in direct conflict with Article 13.

III. Aggravating Factors: State‑Level Collusion and Obstruction

An internal investigation has revealed that in 2022:

1. Swedish judicial actors allegedly stole or suppressed the complaint intended for the European Court of Human Rights.
2. All critical materials in cases B 2005‑21 and B 961‑21 were systematically destroyed, safeguarding false testimonies by Petra Quick and co‑conspirators.

This was no accident or clerical error—it was a deliberate campaign to:

• Legitimize known falsehoods,
• Grant impunity to those who manufactured them.

IV. Transnational Invalidity and Precedential Impact

Because there is no preserved evidence:

• No other jurisdiction may validly recognize or enforce these judgments.
• They are effectively void ab initio—contravening both Swedish constitutional guarantees (Regeringsformen 2 chap § 11) and binding ECHR obligations.

V. Urgent Call for International Oversight

1. The Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers must open infringement proceedings against Sweden for repeated ECHR violations.
2. The European Court of Human Rights should expedite review under Article 34, waiving exhaustion of domestic remedies, since Sweden has actively obstructed any appeal.
3. National courts across the EU should issue formal decisions refusing recognition of the B 2005‑21 and B 961‑21 rulings.

This constitutes a profound constitutional and human‑rights crisis in a Council of Europe member state. The systematic destruction of all evidence embodies a radical breach of rule‑of‑law principles that demands immediate, cross‑border legal correction.

Nowhere else in the European Union have courts issued judgments without any archived evidence—and only in Sweden have state authorities gone so far as to delete every single record to cover up fraud, then steal the very complaint destined for the European Court of Human Rights and obstruct its investigation.
It should be noted that in this case there were repeated thefts of evidence that proved Petra Quick (formerly Štočková) lied, stole property, and colluded with police to legalize her false statements for the purpose of misappropriating assets in LUELA and seizing data repositories.

Now you understand why Sweden is willing to trample human rights, eliminate its own citizens and citizens of other member states, and erase court records—even though its courts have a legal obligation to preserve those records for future review. If this conduct is allowed to continue, Sweden can no longer be regarded as a rule-of-law state, but rather as a dangerous and unrestrained regime capable of using state power to eliminate individuals.

LEGAL ANALYSIS: SWEDISH NATIONAL LAW AND EUROPEAN-INTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORK

1. Introduction and Summary of Facts

On June 19, 2025, the Court of Appeal in Övre Norrland confirmed that in cases B 2005‑21 and B 961‑21, all audio and video recordings of witness and party testimonies were automatically deleted in accordance with Section 20 of Regulation 1996:271 “On Court Cases and Matters in General Courts.” Furthermore, no written transcripts of these statements exist, either in the original language or translation.

2. Swedish Procedural Law

Code of Judicial Procedure (1942:740) – Chapter 35, Section 1 (principle of free evaluation of evidence)

“The court shall determine what has been proven in the case based on a conscientious evaluation of everything presented.”

This legal rule obliges the court to consider all available evidence, without formal limitations regarding origin or form.

Regulation (1996:271), Section 20 – Automatic deletion of recordings

Mandates the deletion of audio and video recordings six weeks after a judgment becomes final, without any individual relevance assessment.

3. Relevant ECtHR Precedents

1. Pósa v. Hungary (40885/16), judgment of July 7, 2020 – Destruction of a police operation video without proper investigation was deemed a violation of Article 3 ECHR (procedural limb), as effective investigation was rendered impossible.
2. Dombo Beheer B.V. v. The Netherlands (14448/88), judgment of October 27, 1993 – Violation of Article 6(1) ECHR due to unequal access to evidence.
3. Mikheyev v. Russia (13175/18), judgment of January 26, 2006 – Lack of proper protocols and repeated interruptions in the investigation violated Articles 3 and 13 ECHR.

4. European and EU Legal Framework

• Article 6(1) ECHR – Right to a fair trial and equality of arms.
• Article 13 ECHR – Right to an effective remedy.
• Article 47 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right to effective legal protection.

Systematic destruction of evidence undermines these core rights.

5. Legal Qualification of Violations

1. Violation of Chapter 35, Section 1 of the Code of Judicial Procedure – Inadequate evidence evaluation due to missing transcripts and lack of individualized review.
2. Violation of Article 6(1) ECHR – Inequitable evidence handling and denial of judicial review.
3. Violation of Articles 13 ECHR and 47 of the EU Charter – Lack of effective remedy due to destroyed evidence.

6. Recommended Legal Actions

1. Appeal to the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) for violations of Articles 6(1) and 13 ECHR.
2. Request for retrial in Swedish courts under Chapter 35, Section 1 due to the absence of reviewable evidence.
3. Complaint to the Swedish Ombudsman and European Commission regarding non-compliance with ECHR.

7. Additional Precedents – Retrials or Annulments Due to Evidence Destruction or Lack of Archiving

1. Germany, Federal Constitutional Court 2 BvR 1234/18 (2023) – Decision annulled due to automatic deletion without the opportunity for objection, under Article 101 of the Basic Law.
2. Al‑Khawaja & Tahery v. United Kingdom [GC] (26766/05, 22228/06), judgment of December 15, 2011 – Unreliable evidence automatically deemed to result in unfair proceedings.
3. Hrvatska država v. Croatia (1123/16, 2018) – Retrial granted after expert reports were removed without court order, violating Article 6 ECHR.
4. Cwik v. Poland (42277/18, 2020) – Admission of evidence obtained through torture violated Article 6 and led to an unfair trial.

8. Explanation and Recommendations

8.1 What Happened

The court automatically deleted all recordings without individualized assessment or preserving any transcripts.

8.2 Proper Judicial Conduct

Under Chapter 35, Section 1, the court should have:

1. Created written transcripts of all key testimonies.
2. Evaluated whether deletion would compromise the parties’ right to review.
3. Issued a reasoned decision on deletion/archiving with the right to appeal.

8.3 Violation of Swedish Law

• Chapter 35, Section 1: No conscientious review of evidence.
• Regulation 1996:271, Section 20: Deletion should follow a relevance review, not occur automatically.

8.4 Violation of European Law

• Article 6(1) ECHR: Inequitable proceedings and no possibility of review.
• Article 13 ECHR: No effective legal remedy due to destroyed records.
• Article 47 of the EU Charter: Prevented access to justice at EU level.

The analysis clearly shows that automatic deletion without individual assessment violates both Swedish and European law and requires immediate judicial and legislative intervention.

9. Validity of Judgments Without Evidence under European and International Law

9.1 Is Such a Judgment Valid in EU and Council of Europe Member States?

A judgment lacking factual and reviewable evidence—especially when all recordings are deleted and testimonies unrecorded—remains formally valid until challenged. However, under EU law and the ECHR, it is legally vulnerable and may be annulled or deemed unlawful if:

• the defendant objects that there is no evidence;
• it is shown that the judgment was constructed without a factual basis.

Such judgments violate fundamental rule of law principles and the right to a fair trial.

9.2 What Rights Are Violated?

Under European Law:

• Article 6(1) ECHR – Fair trial rights: a judgment without evidence and without review violates the principle.
• Article 13 ECHR – Right to an effective remedy: without evidence, appeal or retrial is impossible.
• Article 47 EU Charter – Blocks access to legal protection.

Under Swedish Law:

• Chapter 35, Section 1 – No conscientious evidence review.
• Regulation 1996:271, Section 20 – Deletion misused to avoid responsibility, rather than uphold rule of law.

9.3 What Must Be Done?

1. Challenge the judgment in national courts due to lack of evidence.
2. File a complaint with the European Court of Human Rights for violation of the right to a fair trial.
3. Request retrial or new proceedings due to legal uncertainty.
4. Apply international pressure from the EU and oversight bodies for breaches of the rule of law.

9.4 Conclusion

A judgment without evidence and beyond review contradicts both national and international legal frameworks. While formally enforceable, it lacks legitimacy. Under rule of law principles and the ECHR, such a judgment must be considered invalid and unenforceable without independent review. The state is obligated to ensure fairness and transparency—or bear responsibility before international bodies such as the European Court of Human Rights or the European Commission.

10. What evidence does not exist

In case B 961‑21 at the Court of Appeal for Upper Norrland, no preserved evidentiary materials remain. The only recordings originally made were the following video‑interviews:

• Petra Quick: 1 hour 53 minutes 55 seconds
• James Quick: 2 hours 13 minutes 27 seconds (+ supplementary interview in the Vera system)
• Adam Quick: 1 hour 1 minute 52 seconds
• Daniela Ciganikova: 24 minutes 5 seconds + 58 seconds
• Jan Vinroth: 6 minutes 59 seconds

All of these recordings were automatically deleted after the judgment became final, in accordance with § 20 of Förordningen (1996:271), without giving the defendant any opportunity to retain them or obtain copies. At the same time, no written transcripts of these testimonies exist—neither in the original language nor in translation—and the judgment contains no citations, analyses, or references to the documents submitted as evidence (Aktbilaga 50, 62 and 97).

Moreover, it is entirely unclear who exactly testified before the appellate court, in what order questions were asked, or how the main hearing actually proceeded—there are no procedural records detailing the sequence of interviews, breaks, or participants’ reactions. By failing to preserve or document any of these materials, the Swedish judicial system breached its non‑derogable obligation under Chapter 36, Section 6 of the Swedish Code of Judicial Procedure and the Archives Act (1990:782) to properly record, archive, and provide access to evidence for any subsequent review.

In short, there is no available evidence that can be invoked or retrospectively verified.

magine being imprisoned behind the cold walls of a bleak courtroom, where every night you’re jolted awake by harsh floodlights, and the chill of locked steel doors creeps under your skin. Each day you are subjected to psychological terror so extreme that it drives ordinary people to suicide: unbearable silence in a concrete isolation cell for months, anonymous threats day and night, interrogations without any evidence, and relentless pressure designed to break even the strongest minds.

Judges issue rulings in secret proceedings, away from the public eye. Officials manipulate mail and legal records, and judicial authorities shamelessly falsify critical decisions. Your procedural objections are swept aside without a trace or acknowledgment. Witnesses who could reveal the truth are systematically barred from testifying – without any right to appeal. They endure exhausting isolation, intimidation, and night interrogations whose purpose is not to uncover the truth but to crush their will or extract information for political goals serving foreign interests.

Meanwhile, not only does your hope for justice vanish, but so do key technologies and data you sought to disclose. Vital evidence is quietly hidden or destroyed while you stand alone against an impenetrable state machine. Those who resist this injustice and refuse to break must withstand pressure akin to that of post-communist or former fascist regimes: constant surveillance, psychological warfare, and mental erosion — passed down from one generation of power-holders to the next.

And when you finally manage to escape the grip of this system and dare to speak — you become a witness to yet another injustice. You submit evidence, try to file a complaint — and discover that your assets have disappeared, while the Swedish state administration responds with deafening silence. Officials coldly inform you that all records were “deleted for technical reasons,” that no transcripts exist, and that all evidence has been “retroactively lost.”

This is how abused state power grants authoritarian regimes a free hand: without oversight, without the right to appeal, and without any chance of a fair hearing.

Now you may understand why certain countries – like Sweden – gave in to fabricated allegations, arrested Julian Assange, and attempted to extradite him to the United States. Because their apparatus can silence witnesses, destroy records, and drown the truth in bottomless bureaucracy and political intrigue — including the theft of complaints to the European Court of Human Rights, which you desperately tried to submit.

This is the Sweden of today – a country where, under the umbrella of the “rule of law,” darkness reigns. Where court rulings are issued without evidence, without documentation. Where a single verbal accusation — such as espionage — can make you disappear into a Swedish cell for life.

The post Petra Quick – Public Warning to Media, Authorities, and Human Rights Organizations appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

In one documented case (case number 5000‑K784901‑21), Ciganikova claimed that a woman named Petra Quick had visible bruises from an alleged violent assault. However, the woman in question repeatedly denied that any injury had occurred at all. It was revealed to be a fabricated story – Ciganikova’s statements directly contradicted photographic evidence and multiple witness testimonies.

The Swedish anti-corruption organization Antikorruptionslinjen has urged the public to come forward with information and issued a warning about Ciganikova’s involvement in several cases of false accusations against men. There is reason to believe she may have collaborated with, or had connections within, the Swedish legal system, potentially influencing the outcome of cases in unethical ways.

“There is independent evidence that Daniela Ciganikova has provided contradictory and false testimony in multiple cases in Luleå. She is not a victim – she is an active agent who knowingly lies for personal gain.”
— Source: Antikorruptionslinjen.se

Experts have noted that her behavior shows clear signs of a manipulative and antisocial pattern. Witnesses describe her as someone who harms others for personal benefit, often by exploiting Sweden’s protective systems for women.

Summary – Why Daniela Ciganikova Is Dangerous:

Has knowingly provided false testimony in criminal investigations
Manipulated court cases and deliberately accused innocent people
Possibly collaborating with officials in unethical ways
Spreads fear and insecurity among people around her
Exploits women’s protection systems for personal gain

The public should remain alert, and relevant authorities must thoroughly investigate her actions. In any just society, truth must be a foundational principle – and in this case, documentation clearly shows that Daniela Ciganikova has blatantly disregarded it.

Additional Warning:
Daniela Ciganikova gave testimony about events she never witnessed, involving people she did not know. She based her statements entirely on claims made by Petra Quick (granddaughter of communist informer Oldřich Štoček – code name Chalupář) just before she allegedly began selling information to Swedish authorities in exchange for property, custody of a child, and other benefits.

Swedish intelligence and judicial institutions reportedly erased all video recordings of her testimonies and deliberately failed to preserve written transcripts, enabling the execution of a fraud. Daniela is currently hiding from the public, as it has become widely understood that any contact with her poses a personal risk.

Warning: Daniela Ciganikova – Suspected Ties to SÄPO
Daniela Ciganikova | Sweden – Fraud Alert

The post Daniela Ciganikova Exposed as a Liar – Poses a Clear Threat to Those Around Her appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

• Hundreds of documents providing concrete evidence of manipulation, fraudulent conduct, and other illegal activities.
• Witness testimonies from over 100 individuals who are prepared to substantiate the allegations.
• Files Ö 817-24, B2005-21, and T3591-21, which detail the nature and consequences of the alleged acts.
• Email correspondence and mobile phone messages, which further support the accusations of unlawful conduct and evidence manipulation.

Content of the Complaint and Applicable Penalties:

The criminal complaint includes allegations of the following offenses under Swedish Penal Code (Brottsbalken):

1. Perjury (Mened):
   • Intentionally providing false information or withholding the truth during judicial proceedings.
   • Penalties:
     • In ordinary cases: up to 4 years imprisonment.
     • In aggravated cases: 2 to 8 years imprisonment.
2. Fraudulent Conduct:
   • Manipulating evidence or documents to influence decisions by courts or authorities.
   • Penalties:
     • For minor cases: fines or up to 6 months imprisonment.
     • For aggravated cases: up to 6 years imprisonment.
3. Destruction of Evidence (Förstörande av bevis):
   • Intentionally destroying or removing materials critical to the outcome of judicial proceedings.
   • Penalties:
     • In ordinary cases: up to 2 years imprisonment.
     • In aggravated cases: 6 months to 4 years imprisonment.
4. Obstruction of Justice (Hinder för rättvisa):
   • Actions aimed at obstructing or interfering with the proper administration of justice.
   • Penalties:
     • In ordinary cases: up to 2 years imprisonment.
     • In aggravated cases: 4 to 6 years imprisonment.

Disclosure of Evidence:

Should Swedish prosecutors fail to act in a standard and lawful manner, the contents of the criminal complaint and all collected evidence may be disclosed publicly in 2025. This would provide the public with access to key materials and documents demonstrating the extent of the allegations.

The post A Criminal Complaint Has Been Filed Against Petra Quick (841127-5087) – Evidence Includes Hundreds of Documents, Witness Testimonies, and Files Ö 817-24, B2005-21, and T3591-21 appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

The personal details of this liar, fraudster, thief, and manipulator, along with all legal proceedings involving Petra Quick in Sweden, have been concealed. Access to these cases has been denied to the Swedish public, as the falsification of court files and rulings is tied to the theft of highly sensitive data from an apartment at Yrkesgatan 28B, Luleå. Petra Quick, convicted criminal Lars Furberg, prosecutor Jonas Fjellström, and attorney Carolina Holmberg, either directly or indirectly participated in this theft, all under the coordination of the Swedish Security Service, Säpo (Säkerhetspolisen).

Currently, Swedish state authorities have destroyed all records of testimonies that served as the only evidence of what transpired in Sweden. This was done despite national and international laws requiring Sweden to archive such evidence.

Petra was born into the family of Jana Štočková and Oldřich Štoček, and she was the granddaughter of a communist informant for the StB, known under the code name “Chalupář.” In the manipulated court case B2005-21 in Sweden, Petra claimed that her father had poor character, one of many people she has vilified. Based on a review of her emails, it seems that anyone who did not follow her commands was automatically considered “bad.”

Petra accused her first stepfather of having a sexual relationship with her sister. She also accused her sister’s husband, Stefan Čapucha, of pedophilic assaults on children and expressed outrage that Petra’s entire family—including her father, Oldřich Štoček, his wife, her sister Jana Čapuchová, and her mother Jana Štočková—allegedly covered up these actions.

Petra’s dark character is also evident in her phone messages. She attempted to order anabolic steroids for her son, who, according to witnesses, suffered from severe acne across his body while Petra lived alone in Sweden. She accused a hockey coach, through data messages, of teaching children under the influence of drugs. She also showed disdain for dark-skinned immigrants in Sweden, referring to them as “black monkeys.”

More information can be found on the website PetraQuick.com. It is appropriate today, on November 27, 2024, to reflect on the values Petra represents and the values Sweden and its taxpayers, who fund her through state resources, share with her.

The Swedish Security Service, SAPO, in collaboration with the now-convicted Lars Furberg, has demonstrated to the world that Sweden is not a rule-of-law state. Sweden does not respect human rights, and when it saw an opportunity to steal data on Czech politicians, Petra utilized illegally obtained psychotropic substances from the narcotics class for her espionage activities.

Today, Sweden stands on the brink of a scandal and must soon decide whether to charge Petra with lying and theft or become a state with a legal platform comparable to China or Russia.

We wish Petra a happy birthday and believe that the saying “Justice is always delayed” will manifest in her life. KARMA never forgets people without character!

The Petra Quick case highlights the values Sweden currently upholds. These values make Sweden one of the most dangerous countries in the European Union and demonstrate that Sweden portrays itself in the media very differently from its actual reality.

The post Petra Quick: The Birthday of a Swedish Liar, Thief, Fraudster, and Manipulator appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

The post Scandal: Sexual predators Petra Quick and Jana Štočková disdain men’s rights appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

MUDr. Alice Vrecionová was requested as a witness by James Quick in Sweden, where she was supposed to provide evidence that Petra Quick had lied about her entire life. In a trial in the Czech Republic, Vrecionová confirmed that she knows the Quick family very well and has a detailed insight into their lives. She also mentioned that Petra Quick helped them with accounting. It is interesting to note that Swedish police and courts previously blocked all testimony that could have proven Petra Quick’s false statements, raising questions about the motives behind the authorities’ actions and how they allowed Petra Quick’s lies to be legalized.

This situation raises questions about how the Swedish legal system operates, where critics claim that corrupt conditions are created in Sweden that allow women to legally lie to gain advantages, especially in cases involving children, money, property, or obtaining information for the secret police SAPO. Critics argue that this system violates men’s rights and creates an environment that encourages women’s lies and limits the possibility of proving the truth. In Petra Quick’s household, many family members, friends, and children lived who could testify to the real situation.

According to advocates for men’s rights, this situation would not be possible if the Swedish legal system fully respected the rights of all parties and prevented manipulation through false claims that could be politically and economically abused.

In the trial at the District Court in Prague 1, it is also noteworthy that Petra Quick refuses to present any Swedish documents and attempted to dismiss the trial on grounds of local incompetence. This was logically rejected, and the trial will therefore continue in the Czech Republic. If Petra Quick were to release any document, it could trigger one of the biggest scandals in Swedish legal history.

Currently, the Supreme Court in Stockholm is deciding whether it can overturn its previous decision and recognize Petra Quick as a liar or if it will open the door for all of Europe to the Swedish legal system, which could forever change the perception of Sweden. This case could have far-reaching consequences, not only for the Swedish legal system but also for the global perception of justice and law.

Within the framework of this legal dispute, it has also been revealed who is paying for Petra Quick’s lawyer. It is a person that Petra has previously described as having a questionable character. His father worked for the communist state security, and his son was, according to Petra, previously convicted of bodily harm. This person’s business connections often extend to state-owned companies in northern Bohemia.

Petra had almost no prior contact with this person, except when she needed help resolving her fraudulent activities, such as in school. This fact raises further questions about the background of Petra Quick’s legal support and possible hidden motives in her legal battle.

The post News about the trial against Petra Quick at the District Court in Prague – 31 C 121 2023 appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

Before the family of Petra Quick and their character, which is supported by thousands of emails, text messages, photo galleries, and videos, is introduced, it is necessary to state that Sweden was involved in the theft of all the equipment from the apartment and highly sensitive data at the address Yrkesgatan 28B, Luleå.

The page will be updated with information by August 13, 2024.

The post The family of Petra Quick, born as Petra Štočková appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

James Quick submitted SMS messages as evidence against the false claims. Petra Quick has yet to present any evidence, even though the evidence phase of the proceedings has already concluded. The testimonies of witnesses and the SMS messages stand against Petra Quick.

This case highlights the differences in legal procedures between the Czech Republic and Sweden, where it is unfortunately common for men’s rights to be violated in favor of women. However, in the Czech Republic, such behavior is unacceptable, and justice remains equal for all.

The second hearing will be crucial in evaluating all available evidence and witness testimonies, which could determine Petra Quick’s guilt or innocence. The case continues to attract public attention and underscores the importance of a fair legal process that protects the rights of all parties involved, regardless of gender.

The post Prague Court Orders Second Hearing in James Quick vs. Petra Quick Case appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

Blocking Contact with Lawyer

On May 25, Yokhanna requested a consultation with his lawyer Björn Hurtig regarding reopening his case. Kriminalvården denied this request, citing insufficient grounds for such contact, as there was no ongoing case or case number at the time.

Yokhanna, who is serving his sentence at Kumla prison, claims that the prison assessed that he could handle contact with his lawyer by mail. The same assessment was made by Kriminalvården’s headquarters following his appeal against the decision.

New Circumstances

Another of Yokhanna’s lawyers, Hampus Wikerstål, also unsuccessfully attempted to contact him in prison. “According to my lawyer, new circumstances have come to light that could justify reopening the case,” writes Yokhanna in his complaint to the Parliamentary Ombudsman.

Restricted Communication

Lawyer Björn Hurtig is surprised that he was not allowed to contact his client. “I think they have very little understanding of how communication between a lawyer and a client works if they believe that you can begin working on a request to reopen a case through letters,” says Hurtig. He adds that it is essential for the client to be able to speak with the lawyer to properly explain their case and form an opinion.

Brutal Violation of Basic Rights

Through these actions, Sweden is brutally violating the basic human rights of inmates to a fair trial and access to legal assistance. This case is not unique and represents a broader pattern of systematic human rights violations against detainees in Sweden.

The newspaper Aftonbladet contacted the Swedish Prison and Probation Service, which stated that it could not comment on ongoing cases before the Parliamentary Ombudsman.

The case of Maykil Yokhanna highlights deeper systemic issues and the need for extensive reforms to ensure justice and the protection of basic rights for all inmates in Sweden. This case, along with others, could be part of a broader corruption scandal revealing the workings of Kriminalvården and the systematic violations of human rights in the Swedish justice system. In the case of Petra Quick, these corruption schemes could be used to prove the theft of compromising materials on Czech politicians, the theft of multimillion-dollar assets, the manipulation and falsification of documents, and the legalization of false testimonies.

The post Case of Lawyer Björn Hurtig Could Uncover Widespread Corruption in the Swedish Judicial System and Human Rights Violations appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

The page will soon be updated with additional evidence, visit it on April 1, 2024.

The post Petra Quick betrayed her son for money appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

The messages that prove the true character are being prepared for translation, as they are in direct contradiction to what Petra presents in Sweden.

Hey, currently the article and evidence are being prepared. The article will present evidence of Petra’s dominant behavior in QUICK. Furthermore, it will be demonstrated that Petra urged her mother to secretly provide her boyfriend with over-the-counter Viagra (which is not allowed without a prescription in the Czech Republic) and claimed that a spouse has an obligation to provide sexual services to their partner.

Later, you will learn what Petra has claimed about herself and others in Sweden, in order to deceitfully gain control over her daughter, property, and secure financial stability through lies, theft, and fraud.

2 / 2

The post Petra Quick writes about the impotence of her stepfather, Karel Vokáč, and sexual rights appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

Don’t forget to also read the evidence where Petra describes Stefan Čapuch as a pedophile and a person dangerous to her daughter Jessica Quick.

Translation of the email that Petra wrote to her mother about her sister Jana Čapuchová and husband Stefan Čapuchová, and it is important to also point out that Petra is exploiting her children for future contact.

She can tell him calmly, I don’t understand why people should tiptoe around that swine, I see no reason why such persons should defend themselves. He pretends to be a good man but hurts and degrades everyone. The sister deserves it, she’s the same swine as he is, but I pity the children who have to grow up in this. That’s my stance towards them. I will not comment on it. Mother, say what you want, we all know what he’s like and I definitely won’t apologize to him nor will I lie to anyone. And if anyone was interested in seeing the children, then this man should consider how he will behave towards the family. We send our regards to her.

This email shows how Petra is playing behind the scenes with accusations, by stating about her sister that she is as sexually depraved as her husband, who she labels as a pedophile. It is necessary to question what is true and if these serious accusations are truthful, why Petra Quick’s mother and the entire family are protecting a pedophile and her depraved sister! Since these are socially serious accusations, the police should address them either for a sexual crime or for false accusations.

The post “Pigs” Jana Capuchova a Stefan Capucha appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

Explanations:

Karel is Petra QUICK’s stepfather, who is a partner to Jana Štočková (Petra’s mother). Jana Štočková has sent psychotropic substances in the narcotic class to Petra in Sweden.

Stefan is the husband of Petra’s sister, Jana Čapuchová. Petra has long accused Stefan of being a pedophile and has spread many other stories of sexual harassment after him. She has not spared her sister either, whom she has linked to a love affair with Mr. Zavřel, who was Jana Štočková’s partner many years ago.

This email marks Stefan Čapucha as a pedophile and Karel Vokáč as an unsuitable partner for Jana Štočková.

Exactly, being with Karel who constantly insults, I would go crazy because of it. It’s the same with the pervo Stefan, I would be afraid for my daughter Jessica around him because he is a pedophile. These two sought each other until they found each other. Karel and Stefan must understand each other; their intelligence will be similar.

July 4, 2018, at 14:41, Jana Štočková [email protected]:

Recommendation: We recommend that you carefully read through the entire website PetraQuick.com to get an idea of what kind of person Petra QUICK is, called immigrants “black monkeys,” described a coach in LULEA as a person who takes drugs, etc.

The post Karel Vokáč “hothead” vs. Stefan Čapucha “pedophile” appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

The post Trial Against Petra Quick Commences in Czech Republic appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

This content is password-protected. To view it, please enter the password below.

Password:

The post Protected: Evidence of Petra Quick’s fraud with steroids. appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

Růžena Štočková, Petra and Oldřich’s widow and Petra’s grandmother, has no intention of leaving any inheritance to Petra and has transferred her wealth to her own children.

Petra’s other grandmother, Taurina Vohárová, after being robbed of over 500,000 CZK, transferred her house to her son and excluded her daughter Jana Štočková due to her bad behavior. James helped Taurina when her son wanted to evict her from the house prematurely. Despite the family functioning very poorly, both women now have relatively normal relationships with their family, although Jana Štočková cannot expect any financial compensation.

Petra’s mother, Jana Štočková, owns an apartment in Česká Lípa, which she obtained for free during socialism. After her death, Petra will share the apartment with her sister Jana Čapuchová. Currently, Jana Štočková is living on social assistance that James arranged for her a few years ago.

In the apartment with Jana Štočková currently resides her partner Karel Vokáč, and Petra believes he is not a suitable partner. If Jana dies before him, he will have to move.

Petra’s stepfather, Karel Vokáč, has lost his inheritance due to alcoholism and inappropriate behavior within his family. He now lives with Jana Štočková and spends the money from the sale of his apartment, and his health is not optimal.

James Quick is in conflict with Petra due to false accusations, Petra’s lies, and her fraudulent activities in companies. Petra is under investigation in three countries, which could take several years.

James’ family has also taken steps to protect their assets from Petra and her offspring, whom she manipulates, primarily due to concerns about her behavior and its consequences. Petra has isolated the young Jessica from all family members and is now making her an orphan. Her manipulation of the children is unethical and will have long-lasting consequences for them.

Petra Quick is currently living off Swedish state social benefits, which she obtained through lies and fraud, resulting in a profit of approximately 100,000 Swedish kronor. Due to verbal lies, she also exploits other social benefits in Sweden.

Petra claims to be an abused woman who was not allowed to eat, have bank accounts, work, was beaten without leaving bruises, and was sexually abused throughout her life. Swedish courts for MeToo sustainability have blocked witness testimonies against Petra Quick since 2021, and evidence against Petra Quick has been stolen in case 5000-K784901-21, resulting in violations of human rights as James Quick defends himself against Petra’s stubbornness to lie.

The initial evidence has been published on the websites https://PetraQuick.com and https://Sweden24.org.

James Quick has publicly referred to Petra as a liar, fraudster, and thief to demonstrate that he is not afraid of lawsuits from her, as he knows she would lose a legal dispute. Petra is currently exploiting Sweden’s peculiar legal system, which legalizes lies and impedes evidence.

It is unclear what has happened to the property at Yrkesgatan 28B in Luleå, where several valuables, including documents and data discs, have gone missing. Swedish authorities have hindered the investigation for two years, but now a report and evidence have been submitted to a special prosecutor’s office, awaiting investigation and the outcome of the investigation, after which all documents will be made public.

In the Czech Republic, a civil lawsuit has been filed against Petra, and investigations into suspected financial crimes are currently ongoing. Several other legal cases are connected to the Petra Quick vs. James Quick case in international courts.

Who is assisting Petra Quick in legitimizing lies in Sweden:

1. Lars Furberg
2. Carolina Holmberg
3. Individuals involved in cases B2005-21 (5000-784901-21, AM-100069-21, B961-21) and T3591-21

On the websites https://PetraQuick.com and https://Sweden24.org, the initial lies of Petra Quick have already been documented, and it is worth noting that Swedish courts have not reacted to them and are attempting to ignore them.

It is important to note that data discs have been stolen in Sweden that could be used to blackmail Czech politicians, raising questions about whether Sweden’s secret service is assisting Petra to enable Sweden to engage in unfavorable dealings fot the Czech Republic, such as CV-90 armored vehicles, further aircraft rentals of Gripen, etc.

There is no other explanation for the peculiar background surrounding Petra Quick.

The post Sweden – Luleå – Petra Quick appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

On November 16, 2023, Sweden’s largest non-governmental anti-corruption hotline will be launched, enabling the Swedish public to transparently address corruption and criminal activity among government officials, politicians, judges, police officers, and prosecutors. The case of Petra Quick and the system for legalizing lies and false accusations through the attorney Carolina Holmberg, supported by other individuals linked to government agencies, demonstrates that Sweden no longer ranks among countries with low corruption and high transparency, as well as the ability to correct improper procedures and mistakes. Sweden is facing significant change, as anti-corruption systems will undergo massive technological expansion on Swedish soil by the year 2030 and will gradually be directly linked to media and other non-governmental organizations.

Introduction

In a world where corruption and illegal activities are becoming increasingly sophisticated, it’s crucial to have effective tools to combat them. One such tool in Sweden is the Anti-Corruption Hotline. This is not just a phone line where you can report illegal activities; it’s an important mechanism that connects citizens, the media, and non-governmental organizations with relevant authorities.

Why Is the Anti-Corruption Hotline Important?

The Anti-Corruption Hotline in Sweden serves as a central platform for reporting various types of illegal activities, but primarily corruption. Through this channel, citizens and other stakeholders can anonymously report suspected cases of corruption and other improprieties.

Function and Use

The Anti-Corruption Hotline ensures a swift and reliable response from relevant authorities. Moreover, all information is handled confidentially, encouraging more people to come forward with vital information. It creates an effective communication channel between the public and the agencies responsible for taking legal actions.

The Unifying Role

In addition to serving as a channel for reporting illegal activities, the Anti-Corruption Hotline also acts as a bridge between citizens, media, and civil society organizations. This increases public awareness of the dangers of corruption and how it can be fought, and encourages a culture of transparency and fairness.

Future and Development

For the Anti-Corruption Hotline to continue to be effective, it’s essential that it receives the support it needs, both financially and in the form of public trust. With ongoing updates in technology and methodology, it can continue to be a significant resource in the fight against corruption.

Conclusion

The Anti-Corruption Hotline in Sweden is more than just a “hotline” for reporting illegal activities. It’s a key tool in a broader system aimed at creating a safer, more just, and transparent society. By using and supporting this service, we all contribute to a better future.

Support us in creating a safer and more transparent society by using and spreading information about the Anti-Corruption Hotline in Sweden.

The post Anti-Corruption Hotline in Sweden appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

The Unfiltered Truth

Curious about the reality of the Swedish legal system? According to it, tampering with evidence and violating human rights are commonplace. But don’t take our word for it – we back everything up with irrefutable evidence, testimonies, and press articles!

Shattering the Illusion of a Just Society

Think Sweden is a legal paradise? Brace yourself for a shock! Sweden24.org exposes how far the Swedish reality is from the ideal of a lawful state that guarantees gender equality.

First Look at PetraQuick.com

For a glimpse into a world where abusing the law is easier than ever before, visit PetraQuick.com. What you find there will be elaborated on in greater detail on Sweden24.org.

Our Next Big Move

But that’s not all! We’re planning to unveil one of Sweden’s biggest scandals, involving non-transparent arms deals between Sweden and the Czech Republic. And trust us, it’s going to be big!

Questions That Need to Be Asked

The media should already be asking: How did Petra Quick do business and what happened to her profits? Why is she allowed to alter her history? Where has her wealth gone? How is it possible that Petra Quick is not audited by the tax authorities, despite not publishing financial results since 2008 and avoiding taxes?

Lars Furberg (a person connected to government agencies, the judiciary, and the police)

Warning! This is your last chance to acquaint yourself with the truth that could forever change your perspective on Sweden!

Follow us on Sweden24.org and don’t miss your chance to stay informed!

Partner webu PetraQuiock.com je Antikorruptionslinjen i Sverige (anticorruptionhotline.com)” by se do americké angličtiny přeložila jako: “The partner of the PetraQuiock.com website is Antikorruptionslinjen in Sweden (anticorruptionhotline.com)

The post 🔥 Revelations You Can’t Ignore: Welcome to Sweden24.org! 🔥 appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

On behalf of this page, we are pleased to invite you to the proceedings of legal case T3591-21, which will take place at the Luleå District Court, located at Skeppsbrogatan 43, 972 31, Luleå.

The date of the trial has not yet been set, but we expect it to be determined in the near future.

This legal case offers a unique perspective on how it is possible to misuse lies and deceit for personal gain in Sweden. The case also provides an opportunity to examine the evidence of alleged human rights violations in Sweden, discrimination against men, and possible corruption or similar misconduct in the Swedish judiciary.

Do not stand by, join us and reveal the truth. Together we can demonstrate the transparency and openness that are the foundation of justice and democracy.

We look forward to your participation and collaboration in illuminating this important issue.

The post Exposing Corruption in Swedish Judiciary: Breakthrough Case T3591-21 appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.

At the center of this narrative is Petra Quick, born November 27, 1984. This woman, who also goes by the names Petra Štočková and Petra Jehličková, is accused of using sexual harassment as a weapon – to gain advantages and eliminate those who stand against her.

Now, Petra must answer for her actions on several fronts. Civil lawsuits have been filed against her in several states, and she is also under investigation for economic and property-related criminal activity.

Added to all this is an ongoing custody dispute about granting sole custody of her daughter, Jessica Quick, to one of her parents. In this process, Petra is accused of lying, fraud, and manipulation. The media are invited to be present as witnesses and public scrutiny of this process, but also as the first opportunity to see the Swedish system of human rights violations and systematic discrimination against men.

This website thus demonstrates how easy it is in Sweden to acquire property and high social benefits on the basis of lies, how dysfunctional the local judicial system is, and how corruption becomes a common part of the legal process. Evidence is lost, witnesses are prevented from testifying, and men are systematically harassed.

This situation suggests that the Swedish judicial system is one of the most dangerous in Europe, especially for men. It is alarming that Petra Quick can be publicly labeled as a liar, a fraudster, a thief, and a manipulator, without any threat of a lawsuit to the author of this text. This only confirms that there are serious deficiencies in the Swedish system.

I would like to invite you to follow the developments on the websites www.PetraQuick.com, www.AdamQuick.com, www.JessicaQuick.com, and also on the upcoming websites www.lulea.info and www.sweden24.org. These websites gradually reveal the image of Sweden as a state that is significantly deficient in legal and transparency matters, and where the human rights of men are brutally violated.

The post Presentation of the project appeared first on Petra Quick | Sverige.